ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Sequential blastocyst transfer improved pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: who will be the ultimate beneficiary.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sequential embryo transfer (ET) is a recommended strategy for women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), but it remains unclear which population may benefit from this strategy. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of sequential blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles and the indications for sequential blastocyst transfer. Methods: A total of 639 FET cycles were included in this retrospective study, of which 319 were in the conventional group and 320 were in the sequential group. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 272 FET cycles in each group. Further stratified analyses were conducted based on age, number of previous failed cycles, and number of high-quality blastocysts. Pregnancy outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate, live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy loss rate, early miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and rates of preterm birth and low birthweight in both singleton and multiple pregnancies, were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared to the conventional group, the sequential group had a higher CPR (65.4% vs. 54.4%, Conclusions: Patients with ≥ 3 previous failed cycles or 0 high-quality blastocysts, or patients aged ≥ 40 years, may benefit from the sequential blastocyst transfer strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.