ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2026
Temporary prostate brachytherapy alone or as boost: Single-institution experience on dose-response assessment focusing on sphincter-related urinary toxicity.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the relation between radiation dose to organs at risk (OARs), including internal and external urethral sphincters (IUS, EUS), and the occurrence of urinary toxicity in patients treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods: Two-hundred eighty patients treated with HDR or PDR brachytherapy as monotherapy or boost after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) between 2012 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Prostate, urethra, bladder, rectum, IUS, and EUS were contoured on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Physical dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were converted to EQD Results: Of the 280 patients considered (median follow-up, 92 months; range, 1-146 months), 29 received brachytherapy as monotherapy and 251 as boost after EBRT. Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free estimate (DFE), local recurrence rate, and biochemical disease-free estimate (bDFE) were 89%, 86%, 3.6%, and 81% for brachytherapy alone, and 85%, 86%, 2.9%, and 85% for EBRT plus brachytherapy, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 3 dysuria and incontinence was 3% and 7% at two-years, respectively. Higher EUS dose (D Conclusions: Higher sphincter doses, particularly EUS exposure, were significantly associated with urinary toxicity. The IUS primarily influenced dysuria. Our results highlight the importance of considering both sphincters as individual organs at risk, and support the implementation of specific dose constraints to minimize urinary side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.