ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Minimally Invasive Transitional Full-Mouth Adhesive Rehabilitation of a Patient With Amelogenesis Imperfecta Using Direct and Indirect Composite Restorations: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) comprises a group of inherited conditions affecting enamel formation and mineralization, with significant esthetic, functional, and psychosocial consequences. Management of adolescents with hypocalcified AI remains challenging because of the compromised enamel structure, ongoing craniofacial growth, and need to preserve future restorative options. This report describes a staged direct and indirect composite approach in an adolescent with hypocalcified AI and concomitant Bartter syndrome, including its short-term clinical performance and limitations. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old girl with hypocalcified AI and concomitant Bartter syndrome was referred with chief complaints of poor esthetics, hypersensitivity, and difficulty maintaining oral hygiene. Clinical and radiographic examinations revealed generalized enamel defects, discoloration, attrition, anterior open bite, and gingivitis. Given the patient's age, systemic condition, and ongoing skeletal growth, a minimally invasive transitional rehabilitation was planned. Following digital diagnostic wax-up and mock-up evaluation, the maxillary arch was restored predominantly with indirect composite crowns, whereas the mandibular arch was restored with direct composite restorations without tooth preparation. Treatment was completed over 3 months. Results: At the 3- and 14-month follow-up examinations, the restorations were evaluated descriptively. They remained clinically functional and esthetically acceptable, except for debonding of the direct full-coverage composite restoration on the retained mandibular right primary second molar, which was subsequently restored with a stainless-steel crown. The patient reported subjective improvements in dental hypersensitivity, ability to maintain oral hygiene, smile appearance, and self-confidence. Conclusion: Adhesive rehabilitation using a combination of indirect and direct composite restorations may provide a conservative transitional treatment option for adolescents with hypocalcified AI. In this case, the digital diagnostic wax-up, mock-up evaluation, and staged treatment facilitated communication and preoperative assessment of the proposed outcome while supporting preservation of the remaining tooth structure. Continued follow-up is required, and the need for repair, replacement, or more definitive rehabilitation should be reassessed after further growth and maturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.