SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A meta-analysis of berberine combined with brain-gut axis-targeted agents for diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is high and significantly impairs patient quality of life. Berberine, a naturally occurring isoquinoline alkaloid, shows promise in combination with brain-gut axis-targeted drugs for relieving abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhoea in IBS-D. However, current clinical evidence remains insufficient to conclusively substantiate its efficacy. Aim of the study: Through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, this work comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of berberine in combination with brain-gut axis-targeted medications for the treatment of IBS-D, thereby providing evidence to inform clinical practice. Materials and methods: On 1 December 2025, a comprehensive search was conducted across ten databases, including PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), the Cochrane Library, and Embase, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating berberine in combination with brain-gut axis-targeted medications. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by data extraction. The risk of bias tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and data were analyzed using RStudio software. When two or more studies had comparable interventions and outcome measures, a meta-analysis was conducted, otherwise, a qualitative synthesis was performed. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: A total of 19 RCTs involving 1,489 participants were included in the analysis. Compared with the control groups, the intervention groups showed significant improvements in IBS-D symptoms and patient quality of life. Specifically, combination therapy incorporating berberine significantly increased the overall treatment response rate (odds ratio = 4.19, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 3.13-5.61). With respect to continuous outcomes, combination therapy significantly reduced overall symptom scores (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -3.47, 95% CI: -6.65 to -0.29), particularly reflected by reductions in abdominal pain and bloating severity, along with improvements in diarrhoea-related symptoms. Furthermore, no serious adverse events were reported across the included trials. Conclusion: Berberine combined with brain-gut axis-targeted medications shows promising efficacy and acceptable safety in the treatment of IBS-D. However, existing studies are limited by small sample sizes and methodological weaknesses, and the overall strength of evidence remains insufficient. Larger, rigorously designed RCTs are needed to further confirm its efficacy and safety. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251238184, identifier CRD420251238184.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.