ReviewJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2026
Interventional radiation immune-boosting (iRIB). The role of concomitant interventional radiotherapy (modern brachytherapy) in immunotherapy: A hypothesis-generating systematic review.
Review in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Synergistic activity of radiation and immunotherapy is well known to the extent that it can be referred to as radiation immuno-boosting. Interventional radiotherapy (IRT; modern brachytherapy) has a potential immunomodulatory advantage compared with external beam radiotherapy due to highly conformal dose distribution and dose heterogeneity, engaging multiple immunogenic mechanisms with distinct dose-response profiles. Material and methods: A hypothesis-generating systematic review was conducted in June 2026 using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify clinical studies reporting outcomes of patients treated with IRT plus immunotherapy, including any primary tumor, assessing efficacy and toxicity. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using a GRADE-based approach. Among the identified publications, 13 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. Results: The included studies published between 2019 and 2026 were non-randomized, and comprised 98 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, melanoma, kidney, and pancreatic or lung cancer. IRT was delivered before, concurrently, or in close temporal proximity to immunotherapy. Radiological tumor response of irradiated lesions was consistently reported, although outcome definitions were heterogeneous and often descriptive. Progression-free survival ranged from 1 to over 30 months. Severe treatment-related toxicity (grade ≥ 3) was uncommon, and no unexpected safety signals were observed. Occasional regression of non-irradiated lesions was reported; however, these observations were anecdotal and cannot be reliably attributed to radiation-induced systemic immune activation. Conclusions: Interventional radiotherapy has a biological rationale for potential immunomodulatory interactions with immunotherapy, but these effects have not yet been established clinically. Although current clinical evidence is limited and of very low certainty, preliminary findings support additional prospective investigation. Further prospective studies are required to better characterize the optimal integration of IRT and immunotherapy, including radiation dose, fractionation schedules, and treatment sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.