ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A lightweight edge-deployable detection method for sugarcane stem nodes in intelligent seed cane cutting equipment.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate detection of sugarcane stem nodes is essential for intelligent seed cane cutting, yet existing detectors are often limited by large parameter counts, small target feature loss, and performance degradation under motion blur, making them difficult to deploy on edge devices. Methods: This study developed SAD-YOLOv11, a lightweight and accurate detector based on YOLOv11, incorporating three modifications. These include an average pooling downsampling module named ADown for reducing computational cost while preserving edge features, a self attention based AIFI module for global contextual modeling, and a SEAMHead detection head with joint channel and spatial attention for adaptive feature calibration. The model was evaluated on a custom sugarcane stem node dataset. Results: The model achieved a precision of 95.92%, a recall of 95.66%, and an mAP50 of 97.57%, maintaining detection accuracy at a level comparable to the baseline YOLOv11 while reducing parameter count and FLOPs by 18.13% and 17.55%. Under physically captured motion blur conditions, the model maintained more stable detection than the baseline, with the advantage becoming more pronounced as blur severity increased. Deployment on the Jetson Orin NX platform with TensorRT-FP16 quantization achieved a throughput of 37.1 FPS with a zero frame drop rate at a 30 FPS input frame rate, and compressed the engine size by 46.7%. Discussion: These results suggest that SAD-YOLOv11 achieves a sound balance between detection accuracy and computational efficiency suitable for intelligent seed cane cutting equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.