ArticleHealth science reports2026
Predictors of Intentions to Learn and Adopt Medical Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals in Ghana: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Effective integration of medical artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare delivery requires healthcare professionals to possess the necessary knowledge and skills. This study examined factors associated with healthcare professionals' behavioural intentions to learn about and adopt medical AI in Ghana. Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 1131 healthcare professionals selected through systematic sampling between 15 October and 30 November 2023. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing personal relevance, social norms, self-efficacy, knowledge, behavioural intentions, and learning engagement related to medical AI. Data were entered using EpiData 3.2 and analysed in Stata 18 using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling to identify significant predictors ( Results: Behavioural intention significantly predicted actual knowledge acquisition in medical AI ( Conclusion: The adoption of medical AI among healthcare professionals is predominantly shaped by behavioural intention, self-efficacy, knowledge, and social influences. Strategic interventions that strengthen self-efficacy, underscore the professional relevance of AI, and capitalise on prevailing social norms may serve as critical enablers in advancing AI integration within Ghana's healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.