ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Effects of formal aquatic activities on health and developmental outcomes in infants and toddlers younger than 36 months: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To systematically review and meta-analyze controlled evidence on the effects of formal aquatic activities on health and developmental outcomes in infants and toddlers younger than 36 months. Background: Formal aquatic activities-including infant swimming, neonatal swimming, hydrotherapy, and warm-water bathing-are increasingly used in early-life care, yet existing studies vary in populations, intervention formats, and outcome measures, making overall effects difficult to determine. A structured synthesis is needed to clarify their potential role in early health and development. Methods: We conducted an updated search of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus, SportDiscus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (December 2022 to May 25, 2026) and CNKI (inception to May 25, 2026). Controlled studies evaluating formal aquatic activities in infants or toddlers younger than 36 months were eligible. Outcomes were coded and organized using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY) framework. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for binary developmental classification outcomes. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted where heterogeneity was substantial. Results: 25 studies (3,526 participants; 1,822 aquatic intervention, 1,704 comparator) were included; 22 contributed to the meta-analysis. Across six outcome domains, 87 effect sizes were synthesized. Aquatic activities showed favourable effects on: neurodevelopmental and motor function (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.15), growth and anthropometry (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.63), physiological regulation and safety (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.49-1.22), beneficial developmental classification (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.29-1.62), jaundice burden and bilirubin metabolism (SMD = 2.31, 95% CI 1.37-3.26), and feeding, stool transition, and digestion (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.01). Heterogeneity was highest for jaundice-related outcomes; sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed the favourable direction of effects. Conclusions: This ICF-CY-informed systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that formal aquatic activities may have beneficial effects across multiple health and developmental domains in infants and toddlers under 36 months. These findings support using aquatic activities as a complementary approach in early-life care, while underscoring the need for more rigorous randomized trials, standardized intervention protocols, and longer follow-up to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.