ArticlePain reports2026
Investigating endogenous pain modulation through pupillometry: can pupil size reflect offset analgesia?
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Painful stimuli trigger autonomic nervous system responses, including changes in pupil size, which provide a physiological measure of pain processing and modulation. The endogenous pain modulatory system plays a key role in regulating pain, and its dysfunction contributes to a variety of chronic pain conditions. Offset analgesia (OA) offers a behavioral measure of this system but relies on subjective ratings. Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether pupil size can serve as a physiological proxy of OA in healthy individuals, complementing traditional pain ratings. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy participants completed an OA paradigm applied on the left volar forearm with 3 thermal phases: T1, 47°C for 5 seconds; T2, 48°C for 5 seconds; and T3, 47°C for 20 seconds. Subjective pain intensity was rated verbally (0-10), and pupil size was recorded continuously via infrared pupillometry. Analgesic effects for pain ratings and pupil sizes were quantified by comparing T2 maxima with T3 minima and analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Participants showed a strong OA effect, with pain ratings decreasing by 52% ( Conclusion: Pupil size decreased significantly during OA, consistent with the expected analgesic effect. Whether this truly reflects the endogenous pain modulatory system remains to be confirmed in future studies that include a constant-temperature control condition to establish specificity of the observed pupil response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.