ReviewHealth science reports2026
Intersectional Barriers to and Facilitators of Educational Inclusion for Persons With Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: in low- and middle-income countries, the exclusion of persons with disabilities from education is influenced by a combination of structural, environmental, and psychosocial constraints. These challenges are further compounded by intersecting factors such as gender, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, which deepen existing inequalities. Gaining insight into these overlapping dynamics is essential for advancing inclusive education. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across Google Scholar, PubMed/MEDLINE, ERIC, and African Journals Online, yielding 132 records. This review was retrospectively registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD420261360472). After screening titles and abstracts, assessing full text eligibility, and conducting quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), 23 studies were included in the review. The data were then analyzed and synthesized using a narrative thematic approach. Results: The findings highlight a consistent gap between policy and implementation, alongside insufficient infrastructure and pervasive stigma that hinder inclusive education. Intersectional factors were found to amplify disadvantage, particularly among girls and individuals in rural settings. At the same time, community-based interventions and the use of assistive technologies were identified as important enablers of inclusion. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that educational exclusion arises from interconnected structural and societal influences rather than disability in isolation. Effectively addressing these challenges requires tackling intersectional barriers through systemic reforms, inclusive teaching practices, and active community involvement. Achieving sustainable inclusion will depend on a dual strategy that addresses both individual needs and broader systemic issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.