Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877382›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026

Optimizing Skin Lesion Segmentation With Robust Regularization and Boundary-Aware Techniques.

Potluri Sri Harshitha, Anupama Damarla, Vangala Bhargavi, Tedla Sai Charan, Batchu Sai Karthik, Karthika, Sumathi D, Gouranga Mandal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Potluri Sri HarshithaMs. Harshitha, Ms. Bhargavi, Mr. Charan, and Mr. Karthik are with the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh University, Amaravati, India.
Anupama DamarlaDr. Damarla is with the Department of Data Science, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, India.
Vangala BhargaviMs. Harshitha, Ms. Bhargavi, Mr. Charan, and Mr. Karthik are with the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh University, Amaravati, India.
Tedla Sai CharanMs. Harshitha, Ms. Bhargavi, Mr. Charan, and Mr. Karthik are with the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh University, Amaravati, India.
Batchu Sai KarthikMs. Harshitha, Ms. Bhargavi, Mr. Charan, and Mr. Karthik are with the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh University, Amaravati, India.
KarthikaMs. Karthika is with the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh University, Amaravati, India.
Sumathi DDr. Sumathi D is with the Department of Cybersecurity, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, India.
Gouranga MandalDr. Mandal is with Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin segmentation of lesions can be challenging because it relies on numerous factors such as size, shape, and position. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have shown exceptional efficacy in automating image segmentation. The inability of current CNNs to maintain local features and emphasize pertinent information restricts decision-making ability. To achieve more precise medical image segmentation, this research suggests a CNN with a spatial feature mechanism (UCMNet). The UNet architecture serves as the foundation for UCMNet. To retain an image's local features during downsampling and increase the relevance of the feature maps supplied to the upsampling module relative to the ground truth, a spatial multiple-scale characteristic (SA) module is included in the decoder. Comprehensive tests were conducted on the 3D-TBP dataset. The suggested UCMNet outperformed UNet in skin lesion tissue segmentation, with an average Dice score improvement of 0.82% and 0.85%, respectively. The suggested UCMNet outperformed UNet in skin lesion tissue segmentation, with an average Dice score improvement of 0.03 and the Intersection over Union also rose by 0.08. The pixel error fell from 0.7132 to 0.6083 pixels, indicating better segmentation performance. When the segmentation area contains interference factors and the initial image of skin lesions has an indistinct boundary, UCMNet can achieve better results. It demonstrated strong segmentation ability by incorporating attention mechanisms into the encoder and applying comprehensive attention methods.

Indexed as

CNNdeep learningDermoscopic imagesskin lesion segmentationUCM-Net

Identifiers

PMID42877382
PMCPMC13668098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.