ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Increased Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Positioning with an Automatic Impaction Device in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditionally, cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been primarily performed using a manual technique involving a hammer and an impactor. During cup insertion into the acetabulum, the manual technique may cause temporary limitations in visualization, discrepancies in the applied force, and imbalances in the force vector. Recently, automatic impaction devices have been developed and adopted for cup insertion. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of cup positioning in primary THA between the manual technique and the use of an automatic impaction device. Methods: A total of 67 hips that underwent primary THA were retrospectively evaluated: 36 hips using the manual technique and 31 hips using an automatic impaction device. The accuracy of acetabular cup positioning between the 2 groups was compared using the Lewinnek safe zone, which indicates accurate cup placement, based on postoperative measurements of cup anteversion and inclination angle. Six methods for measuring anteversion were applied in this study. In addition, the incidence of acetabular screw augmentation and the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications up to 1 year after surgery were assessed. Results: The proportion of cases positioned within the Lewinnek safe zone was higher in the automatic group than in the manual group across all measurement methods. Regarding postoperative complications, 1 episode of dislocation occurred in the manual group, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Conclusions: An automatic impaction device can improve the accuracy of THA cup positioning compared with the manual technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.