SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Prediction accuracy of available early warning systems for air pollution across WHO South-East Asia region: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ambient air pollution is a major environmental health risk across developing nations in the WHO South-East Asia Region (SEARO), contributing substantially to premature mortality and the global disease burden. While Air Quality Early Warning Systems (AQEWS) enable proactive public health interventions, their regional predictive accuracy remains uncharacterized. Despite their increasing importance, the predictive performance and methodological quality of AQEWS across SEARO have not been systematically evaluated. To address this gap, this study systematically evaluated the accuracy of available AQEWS across the region. Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420251275901) searched major databases from inception to February 10, 2026, for observational modeling studies reporting quantitative AQEWS performance in SEARO. Reviewers extracted data and assessed bias using PROBAST+AI. Primary outcomes were RMSE, R Results: Fourteen studies (India, Bangladesh, Thailand) from 839 records were synthesized; heterogeneity disallowed meta-analysis. Hybrid deep learning architectures consistently yielded the lowest RMSE (0.84-4.61 μg/m Conclusion: While hybrid and deep learning models demonstrated superior forecasting accuracy over traditional methods, widespread policy implementation across SEARO was hindered by poor methodological validation. This review provides a regional synthesis of AQEWS forecasting performance and identifies key methodological limitations that currently constrain their reliability for public health decision-making. Standardized reporting and rigorous external validation are urgently required to ensure these systems reliably inform regional public health emergency responses. Systematic Review Registration: identifier: CRD 420251275901.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.