ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Multidimensional psychosocial correlates of food addiction status and symptom count in Chinese candidates for bariatric surgery: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the associations of sociocultural appearance pressure, depressive and anxiety symptoms and body appreciation with food addiction status and symptom count among Chinese candidates for bariatric surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 240 candidates for bariatric surgery. Food addiction status and symptom count were assessed using the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0); psychosocial measures included the depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), body appreciation (BAS-2), sociocultural attitudes toward appearance (SATAQ-4). Logistic regression was used to analyze food addiction status, and negative-binomial regression was used to analyze food addiction symptom count. The primary analysis used the full Model 3, which simultaneously included demographic, lifestyle and psychological variables. Hierarchical comparisons of Models 1 and 2 were treated as exploratory analyses. Results: Among the 240 participants, 95 (39.6%) met the criteria for food addiction. In the full logistic model, BMI (OR per SD = 1.549, 95% CI 1.094-2.193; Conclusion: Associations differed by outcome. BMI and family pressure were associated with food addiction status, whereas family pressure, depressive symptoms and body appreciation were associated with symptom count. Family pressure was the only pressure source with a statistically significant independent coefficient in the full models, but its coefficient did not differ significantly from peer or media pressure. These cross-sectional findings describe associations and require prospective research and external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.