ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2026
Spine Sound Classification: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach.
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-cost, non-invasive screening tools for lumbar degenerative disease could complement imaging in resource-limited settings. This study presents a machine-learning framework to classify spine sounds recorded during lumbar motion and distinguish subjects with MRI-confirmed intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration from asymptomatic controls. From each recording, we extract a 127-dimensional feature vector (MFCC statistics and temporal/spectral energy descriptors) and apply L1-norm-inducing kernel PCA (min and min-sign kernels) to obtain a compact, outlier-robust latent representation. Classification is performed using standard learners (SVM, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and KNN) under leave-one-patient-out (LOPO) cross-validation. The best configuration (min-kernel L1-kPCA with 20 components) achieves 93.3% accuracy with 93.0% sensitivity and 0.952 specificity (95% Wilson CI: 0.842-0.987) with an SVM classifier under rigorous LOPO cross-validation, outperforming the no-kPCA baseline (90.8% accuracy) and matching the neural network-based solution (93.3%). These results suggest that robust nonlinear feature compression can substantially improve spine sound classification and motivate external validation toward point-of-care screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.