ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026
Machine learning prediction of early hypothermia in sepsis patients.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome caused by infection and remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Abnormal body temperature, especially hypothermia (body temperature < 36°C), is a key clinical feature in sepsis patients and is closely associated with disease severity, impaired immune function, and poor prognosis. Early prediction of hypothermia is crucial for timely intervention and improving prognosis. Material and methods: This study used machine learning algorithms to train and validate a prediction model for early temperature changes in critically ill sepsis patients. Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database and five models were established: XGBoost, LR, SVM, KNN, and ANN. Results: The XGBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance with AUC values of 0.92 in the training cohort and 0.98 in the validation cohort. Conclusions: This model can assist clinicians in identifying sepsis patients at high risk for early hypothermia and implementing early intervention to reduce mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.