ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026
Association between the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota and osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study from NHANES among individuals aged ≥ 50 years.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The gut microbiota serves as a critical interface between the host's internal environment and external factors, influencing bone mass and quality by modulating immune homeostasis, mineral absorption, and the production of systemically active metabolites. In this context, the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) provides a valuable metric for quantifying diet quality in relation to microbiota health. Therefore, investigating the association between DI-GM and the risk of osteoporosis (OP) is important for developing evidence-based dietary prevention guidelines. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study leveraged data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2005-2010 and 2013-2014. Multivariable weighted logistic regression (WLR) models were employed to ascertain the association between DI-GM and the prevalence of OP. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were leveraged to explore the dose-response relationship between DI-GM and OP. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were performed to validate the reliability of the findings. Results: Our analysis included 8,065 U.S. adults aged ≥ 50 years. The multivariable WLR analysis revealed that the risk of OP significantly decreased with increasing DI-GM scores (OR = 0.929, 95% CI: 0.874-0.988, Conclusions: Higher DI-GM scores were associated with lower risk of OP, indicating a protective role for diets that enhance GM diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.