ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Acoustic and perceptual evidence relevant to sexual selection in human voice dimorphism.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male and female voices differ markedly in pitch and timbre. Previous work suggests that fundamental frequency (F0) and formant dispersion (Df) correlate with body size, but whether these associations hold within each sex and whether subtle acoustic changes affect social perception remain unclear. We integrate acoustic measurements and perceptual experiments to dissect the roles of F0 and Df in signaling height and guiding social judgments. Acoustic data from 40 males and 40 females showed that F0 exhibited a substantial sex difference but little evidence of a within-sex association with height, whereas Df showed substantial sex differences and more limited, vowel-specific within-sex height associations, with the clearest evidence observed for female /a/ Df. In the perception module, 90 raters evaluated voices manipulated by ±1 just-noticeable difference (JND) in F0 or Df. Across the four evaluator-stimulus conditions, Df produced larger estimated perceptual effects than F0 within each corresponding rating task. Together, these findings suggest that Df may retain some height-related information while contributing to social voice perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.