Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Complementary white matter networks support flexible concept learning.

Melisa Gumus, Nahal Alizadeh Saghati, Michael L Mack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melisa GumusDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nahal Alizadeh SaghatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael L MackDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Concept learning is not an isolated act of cognition; it recruits a host of core mechanisms, including working memory, decision making, and attention. A wide range of brain networks spanning cortical and subcortical areas support these operations, which have been identified via activation patterns related to concept learning. A critical open question, however, is whether the white matter architecture connecting these regions serves as the structural scaffold that makes such flexible learning possible. Methods: We employed a rule-plus-exception learning paradigm wherein participants categorized visually complex stimuli. While some items closely followed the rules, exceptions violated them, acting as a behavioural index of flexible learning. We quantified the integrity of white matter tracts across the whole human brain using diffusion-weighted imaging and leveraged correlational tractography to uncover their behavioural relevance. Results: Correlational tractography revealed two distinct white matter networks associated with individual variability in either rule or exception learning. The network supporting exception learning was predominantly subcortical-limbic, comprising the fornix, thalamic radiations, and forceps minor alongside the left frontal-parietal cingulum, a pattern consistent with hippocampal-prefrontal communication and cognitive control over atypical exemplars. Conversely, the network for rule-based items was distinguished by long-range cortico-cortical and cortico-cerebellar pathways, including the right frontal-parietal cingulum, the middle longitudinal fasciculus, and the middle cerebellar peduncle, reflecting the integration of visual features with abstract rule representations and their gradual automatization. Discussion: These findings provide novel evidence that complementary white matter networks support flexible concept formation and offer a neuroanatomical basis for characterizing individual differences in flexible concept learning.

Indexed as

brain networkscategory learningcorrelational tractographydiffusion imagingwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID42877089
PMCPMC13662064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.