ReviewNanoscale advances2026
Biomaterial-driven remove-remodel-repair (3R) strategy for full-cycle gastric cancer management: bibliometric mapping, preclinical evidence, and a translational roadmap.
Review in Nanoscale advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and is characterized by prolonged precancerous progression, dynamic tumor-immune-microbiota interactions, and treatment-associated toxicity that can compromise host defense and tissue recovery. These features create a clinical need for full-cycle management spanning prevention, early eradication, advanced therapy, and postoperative rehabilitation. Here, we propose a biomaterial-driven 3R framework for GC management across the disease continuum, comprising remove for lesion clearance, remodel for immune microenvironment regulation, and repair for tissue restoration. A bibliometric analysis of 1559 publications maps the evolution of biomaterial-enabled GC research and provides an evidence landscape for this framework. Representative nanomaterials, biomimetic hydrogels, engineered microbial carriers, and regenerative matrices are mapped to clinical needs across prevention, endoscopic and perioperative intervention, systemic therapy, and rehabilitation. The 3R occupy distinct translational tiers: remove- and remodel-oriented platforms are predominantly supported by mechanistic preclinical studies, whereas selected repair-oriented materials, including endoscopic hemostatic, sealing, and submucosal-support platforms, already have human clinical evidence. Overall, the 3R framework links therapeutic objectives, material functions, disease stages, and clinically relevant endpoints into a translational roadmap for integrated GC management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.