ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for demoralization syndrome in patients with chronic heart failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the associated factors for demoralization syndrome in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and to develop a risk prediction model that facilitates early identification of high-risk individuals. Methods: A total of 331 patients with CHF were recruited from two hospitals in Anhui Province, China, between March 2025 and February 2026 using convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and validated scales were used to assess demoralization, social support, and symptom burden. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed-specifically, univariate analysis was employed to screen for associated factors, while multivariable regression was applied to identify independent predictors and construct the prediction model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: Demoralization syndrome was identified in 57.7% of patients. In the univariate analyses, several variables emerged as associated factors. In the multivariable model, exercise frequency, NYHA functional class, SSRS score, KCCQ score, and blood stasis constitution were identified as independent predictors and were incorporated into the final prediction model. The AUC was 0.835 (95% CI: 0.783-0.886) in the training set and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.735-0.909), in the validation set. The model showed good calibration and favorable clinical net benefit. Conclusion: Exercise frequency, NYHA functional class, social support, symptom burden, and blood stasis constitution are independent predictors of demoralization syndrome in patients with CHF. The proposed prediction model demonstrated robust discrimination and calibration in internal validation, suggesting its potential as a preliminary auxiliary reference for risk awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.