ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and arabic translation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & aim: Rhinoplasty is among the most commonly performed cosmetic surgeries, yet patient satisfaction with this procedure tends to be lower compared to other facial aesthetic surgeries. To measure patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty, the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire is employed. Therefore, this research was designed to determine the dependability and accuracy of the Arabic version of the ROE questionnaire. Methods: In this prospective study, the ROE questionnaire was administered to 76 patients who underwent rhinoplasty and seventy-four (74) volunteers who did not require functional or cosmetic nasal surgery. Started from June 2019 up to February 2021, The patients were followed up at 3 and 9 months after the procedure. To compare the initial distribution of questionnaire items between patients and control groups, an unpaired Results: The control group exhibited a notably higher average total ROE score compared to the patient group, with scores of seventy-eight point six percent (78.6%) and forty-five point six per cent (45.6%), respectively ( Conclusion: The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing outcomes in Arabic-speaking patients who have undergone rhinoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.