ReviewCureus2026
Bias Mitigation Across the Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bias remains a difficult issue when applying artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Many types of bias can appear at various stages of AI development, and bias has been shown to perpetuate disparities in vulnerable populations. Current literature tends to either be an exploration of a particular method or a review discussing multiple approaches but fails to explore how the approaches work together. This narrative review summarizes recent approaches to mitigating bias in healthcare AI and organizes them within a practical lifecycle framework spanning data acquisition, preprocessing, model training, validation, and deployment. A structured literature search was conducted using PRISMA-informed principles. Keywords "Artificial intelligence", "bias mitigation", and "artificial intelligence bias mitigation" were searched on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, MedRxiv, and Google Scholar. Articles from 2018 to 2024 in English that explained a method for mitigating bias in AI were included. Reviews were excluded. The search identified 340 records. After removal of duplicates and screening, 16 articles were included. Many techniques were designed to guide the composition of the training data, mainly sampling methods. Datasets are also augmented with newer methods such as adversarial learning and subpopulation techniques. New model structures, loss functions, and algorithms are being applied in medical settings. The review explains the mechanics behind these methods and the settings in which they can be used. Addressing AI bias in healthcare requires multiple approaches targeting many stages of AI development, including data preprocessing, model training, and validation. Recent innovations include adversarial learning and hybrid models. We propose a practical lifecycle protocol encouraging multifaceted approaches that address bias at all stages of development. Ongoing studies are needed to validate these methods clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.