Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877030›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Bias Mitigation Across the Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Lifecycle: A Structured Narrative Review.

Wenzhi Tseng, Kyla S Holbrook, Radhika L Edpuganti, Mariam Girgis, Dana Chen, Benson Babu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenzhi TsengInternal Medicine, New York Medical College, New York, USA.
Kyla S HolbrookInternal Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, USA.
Radhika L EdpugantiInternal Medicine, Henry Ford Genesys, Grand Blanc, USA.
Mariam GirgisInternal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, USA.
Dana ChenSchool of Osteopathic Medicine, A.T. Still University, Mesa, USA.
Benson BabuInternal Medicine, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bias remains a difficult issue when applying artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Many types of bias can appear at various stages of AI development, and bias has been shown to perpetuate disparities in vulnerable populations. Current literature tends to either be an exploration of a particular method or a review discussing multiple approaches but fails to explore how the approaches work together. This narrative review summarizes recent approaches to mitigating bias in healthcare AI and organizes them within a practical lifecycle framework spanning data acquisition, preprocessing, model training, validation, and deployment. A structured literature search was conducted using PRISMA-informed principles. Keywords "Artificial intelligence", "bias mitigation", and "artificial intelligence bias mitigation" were searched on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Semantic Scholar, MedRxiv, and Google Scholar. Articles from 2018 to 2024 in English that explained a method for mitigating bias in AI were included. Reviews were excluded. The search identified 340 records. After removal of duplicates and screening, 16 articles were included. Many techniques were designed to guide the composition of the training data, mainly sampling methods. Datasets are also augmented with newer methods such as adversarial learning and subpopulation techniques. New model structures, loss functions, and algorithms are being applied in medical settings. The review explains the mechanics behind these methods and the settings in which they can be used. Addressing AI bias in healthcare requires multiple approaches targeting many stages of AI development, including data preprocessing, model training, and validation. Recent innovations include adversarial learning and hybrid models. We propose a practical lifecycle protocol encouraging multifaceted approaches that address bias at all stages of development. Ongoing studies are needed to validate these methods clinically.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in medicinebias in healthcarebias mitigationperformance metricssampling method

Identifiers

PMID42877030
PMCPMC13662775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.