ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2026
Comprehensive clinical dosimetry in contact skin interventional radiotherapy (modern brachytherapy): Practical tips and tricks.
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Contact interventional radiotherapy (cIRT) is an effective option for non-melanoma skin cancers, particularly in anatomically complex sites, where organ preservation, functional results, and cosmetic outcomes are relevant. This paper summarized practical dosimetric considerations in cIRT, focusing on the therapeutic window, surface curvature, boluses and air gaps, dose calculation algorithms, and 3D-printed devices. Material and methods: Key physical and clinical factors affecting dose distribution were analyzed from recent literature, including prescription depth, source-to-skin distance, applicator geometry, tissue interfaces, and patient-specific device design. Results: Therapeutic window is influenced by target thickness, source-to-skin distance, and surface curvature. Multilayer and intensity-modulated arrangements may improve target coverage while limiting superficial hotspots. Bolus and air gaps can modify local dose distribution, especially in irregular anatomical regions, while model-based algorithms better account for heterogeneities and interfaces than TG-43. 3D-printed applicators may further enhance conformity, reproducibility, and organs at risk sparing. Conclusions: Although clinically non-invasive, cIRT requires careful dosimetric optimization. Appropriate management of applicator geometry, dose calculation, bolus, air gaps, and patient-specific devices, may improve treatment accuracy, target coverage, and toxicity control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.