ReviewArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2026
Return-to-Sport Assessment After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Shows Substantial Variability in Objective Criteria.
Review in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate objective return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes and limb symmetry index (LSI) data after primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in patients with patellar instability. Methods: A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase (2000-2024) identified studies reporting RTS outcomes and LSI-based performance testing in patients undergoing primary MPFLR. Clinical and observational studies reporting objective metrics such as isokinetic strength and hop testing were included. Results: Six studies including 243 patients (64% women, mean age 19.4 years) undergoing primary MPFLR were included. Several studies included patients undergoing concomitant bone procedures (41%), such as tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty. Objective RTS testing commonly included isokinetic strength (4 studies), hop testing (3 studies), and Y-Balance testing (2 studies). Follow-up testing ranged from 6 to 8 months postoperatively. Reported LSI values ranged from 83% to 94% for isokinetic flexion, 70% to 96% for isokinetic extension, 85% to 93% for single hop, and 90% to 97% for triple hop. Time to RTS ranged from 6.1 to 8.1 months across studies, with RTS rates from 85% to 100%. However, only 14% to 40% of patients met all study-specific RTS criteria when reported. Testing protocols and thresholds varied across studies, contributing to heterogeneity in outcomes. Conclusions: Few studies reporting RTS outcomes after MPFLR incorporate LSI measures as part of RTS assessment, and only a minority define explicit RTS criteria based on objective testing. Among studies that reported LSI, quadriceps strength frequently remained below 90% LSI at the time of RTS. Despite high reported RTS rates, substantial variability exists in RTS assessment after MPFLR. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level III to IV studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.