ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
An innovative framework based on GMV-ALFF multi-modal MRI and Gaussian data augmentation for psychiatric disorder classification.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD) exhibit significant overlap in clinical symptoms, posing substantial challenges to accurate diagnosis. This study proposes an innovative multi-modal fusion framework based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), integrating structural and functional MRI biomarkers-gray matter volume (GMV) and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF). Methods: Total 31 patients with schizophrenia, 48 patients with bipolar disorder, and 38 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled and underwent resting-state fMRI scans. The framework comprises three core components: Gaussian data augmentation to mitigate the limitation of small sample sizes; a dedicated CNN architecture for processing GMV and ALFF features to generate class probability outputs for SZ, BD, and HC; and DempsterShafer (D-S) evidence theory for robust multi-modal decision fusion. Results: Extensive 5-fold cross-validation confirms the framework's efficacy: it achieves superior performance metrics (Accuracy: 0.9656 ± 0.0324, Precision: 0.9698 ± 0.0319, Recall: 0.9656 ± 0.0324, F1-Score: 0.9661 ± 0.0324) and outperforms traditional machine learning methods (SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost, KNN). Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the proposed multi-modal fusion approach enhances the ability to differentiate among SZ, BD, and HC compared to unimodal classification methods, providing a reliable technical support for the auxiliary diagnosis of psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.