Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876973›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

AI and the future of teachers: predicting stakeholders' expectations of teacher job loss from AI-related institutional conditions.

Georgios P Georgiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Georgios P GeorgiouDepartment of Languages and Literature, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming educational work, although claims that it will replace teachers often overlook the institutional conditions that make teacher job loss appear more or less likely. This study examined whether current AI-related institutional risk conditions predict stakeholder expectations of teacher job loss over the next decade. Methods: A purposive sample of 300 education and AI stakeholders rated the extent to which 11 conditions were currently present and provided a separate 0-10 score indicating the extent to which they expected AI to contribute to teacher job loss. Results: Overall job-loss expectations were low to moderate, and the institutional AI condition indicators showed good internal consistency. The machine learning model showed good predictive performance in the original held-out test set ( Discussion: The findings suggest that the extent to which stakeholders perceive AI-related institutional risk conditions to be currently present in educational settings is associated with the extent of teacher job loss they expect. They further indicate that this risk is not an inevitable technological outcome, but is embedded in a broader institutional ecology, with expectations clustering more strongly around direct forms of AI-mediated instructional restructuring than around indirect institutional or governance-related vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceinstitutional indicatorsjob lossmachine learningpredictionteachers

Identifiers

PMID42876973
PMCPMC13661954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.