SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Functional magnetic resonance imaging in neuropathic pain: a bibliometric analysis incorporating machine learning.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) affects 6.9%-10% of the global population. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become central to NP investigation, yet few studies have systematically mapped this literature. We used bibliometric and machine-learning methods to chart the fMRI-NP research landscape. Methods: We retrieved 1,866 fMRI-NP articles (2005-2025) from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed publication trends, citation metrics, and collaborative networks with CiteSpace and VOSviewer, complemented by exploratory topic modeling based on term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), and by community detection combining GraphSAGE node embeddings with density-based spatial clustering (DBSCAN). Results: The corpus amassed 94,160 citations, with an average of 50.46 per article and a corpus h-index of 139. Annual output rose from 35 articles in 2005 to 156 in 2025, following a power-law trend (R Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric mapping of the fMRI-NP research landscape, characterizing its growth trajectory, the most productive countries, institutions and journals, the most co-cited references, and the recurrent themes in the literature. The mapping indicates increasing attention to brain connectivity, multimodal imaging, and computational text analysis. These bibliometric patterns delineate active and emerging areas of research activity and may help orient future literature-based inquiry and collaboration in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.