Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876950›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2026

Applicator-dependent differences between TG-43 and a grid-based Boltzmann solver in iridium-192 high-dose-rate gynecological brachytherapy.

Bojan Pavičar, Andrej Milosavljević, Branko Predojević, Borislava Petrović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bojan PavičarFaculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Andrej MilosavljevićRadiotherapy Department, International Medical Centers, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Branko PredojevićFaculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banja Luka, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Borislava PetrovićFaculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare TG-43 and Acuros Material and methods: This retrospective dosimetric study included 40 patients and 121 treatment plans: tandem and ring (T&R, 34 plans), tandem and ovoid (T&O, 38 plans), segmented cylinder (SC, 23 plans), and universal multi-channel cylinder (UMC, 26 plans). All plans were generated in BrachyVision™ v. 15.6 using the TG-43 formalism and subsequently recalculated with Acuros Results: TG-43 yielded consistently higher dose estimates than Acuros Conclusions: TG-43 systematically overestimated dose relative to Acuros

Indexed as

Acuros BVapplicator geometrydose calculationdosimetrygynecologic brachytherapyTG-43

Identifiers

PMID42876950
PMCPMC13662469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.