Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876942›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2027

Benchmarking deep learning-based reconstruction methods for photoacoustic computed tomography with clinically relevant synthetic datasets.

Panpan Chen, Seonyeong Park, Gangwon Jeong, Refik Mert Cam, Umberto Villa, Mark A Anastasio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Panpan ChenUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering, Urbana, Illinois, United States.
Seonyeong ParkWashington University in St. Louis, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-8693
Gangwon JeongWashington University in St. Louis, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Refik Mert CamUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Urbana, Illinois, United States.
Umberto VillaThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-2559
Mark A AnastasioUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Bioengineering, Urbana, Illinois, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-4172

Funding

The Center for Label-free Imagingand Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB)P41EB031772 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Stephen A Boppart · 2022 to 2026
$7.6M
A Computational Framework Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of 3D Quantitative Optoacoustic Tomography Breast ImagingR01EB031585 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Advancing three-dimensional preclinical dynamic contrast-enhanced photoacoustic computed tomography via quantitative image reconstructionR01EB034261 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Umberto Villa · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Deep learning technologies for estimating the optimal task performance of medical imaging systemsR01EB034249 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mark A Anastasio · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031772NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031585NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034249NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction methods for photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) have developed rapidly in recent years. However, most existing methods have not employed standardized datasets, and their evaluations rely on traditional image quality (IQ) metrics that may lack clinical relevance. The absence of a standardized framework for clinically meaningful IQ assessment hinders fair comparison and raises concerns about the reproducibility and reliability of reported advancements in PACT. Aim: A benchmarking framework is proposed that provides open-source, anatomically plausible synthetic datasets and evaluation strategies for DL-based acoustic inversion methods in PACT. Approach: The datasets each include over 10,000 two-dimensional (2D) stochastic breast objects with clinically relevant lesions and paired measurements at varying modeling complexity. The evaluation strategies incorporate both traditional and task-based IQ measures to assess fidelity and clinical utility. A preliminary benchmarking study is conducted to demonstrate the framework's utility by comparing DL-based and physics-based reconstruction methods. Results: The benchmarking study demonstrated that the proposed framework enabled comprehensive, quantitative comparisons of reconstruction performance and revealed important limitations in certain DL-based methods. Although they performed well according to traditional IQ measures, they often failed to accurately recover lesions. This highlights the inadequacy of traditional metrics and motivates the need for task-based assessments. Conclusions: The proposed benchmarking framework enables systematic comparisons of DL-based acoustic inversion methods for 2D PACT. By integrating clinically relevant synthetic datasets with rigorous evaluation protocols, it enables reproducible, objective assessments and facilitates method development and system optimization in PACT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotoacoustic TechniquesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsBenchmarkingBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansReproducibility of Resultsbenchmarkingdeep learningimage reconstructionoptoacoustic computed tomographyphotoacoustic computed tomographyvirtual imaging studies

Identifiers

PMID42876942
PMCPMC13662376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.