Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876941›Full record

ArticleGlobal surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education2026

Developing and evaluating image-based metrics for open surgical suturing skill assessment.

Jianxin Gao, Simar P Singh, Amir Mehdi Shayan, John F Eidt, Joe Bible, Joseph Vincent Valentino Blas, Sagar S Gandhi, Ravikiran Singapogu, Richard E Groff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianxin GaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.
Simar P SinghDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.
Amir Mehdi ShayanDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.
John F EidtDivision of Vascular Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, TX USA.
Joe BibleSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.
Joseph Vincent Valentino BlasSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC USA.
Sagar S GandhiSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC USA.
Ravikiran SingapoguDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.
Richard E GroffDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6994-821X

Funding

SutureCoach: Examining Vascular Suturing Skills Assessment, Training, and Transfer of Training via Objective MetricsR01HL146843 · NHLBI · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SINGAPOGU, RAVIKIRAN · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Open surgery training is vital in vascular surgery education. Traditionally, trainees' open surgical suturing skills are evaluated by their educators, which is a subjective and time-consuming process. This paper evaluates image-based metrics for surgical suturing skill assessment by comparing performance among three groups: attending surgeons, resident surgeons, and novices. Methods: A simulator, named SutureCoach, is developed to simulate a radial suturing task, performed either at "depth," representing a cavity, or at "surface." Among other sensors, the simulator includes cameras and computer vision software to track the motion of the needle and thread under the membrane being sutured. A set of image-based metrics are calculated for each suture based on video data. The set of metrics includes four previously proposed metrics as well as four new metrics inspired by a refined suturing phase segmentation scheme. To evaluate the performance of the image-based metrics, we conducted a study with 97 participants, divided almost evenly between attending surgeons, resident surgeons, and novices. Data was collected at several events over a 5-month period. Results: The statistical analysis shows that all metrics have significantly different means when comparing performance between novices and surgeons at both conditions, surface and depth. Furthermore, seven out of eight metrics have significant mean differences when comparing resident surgeons' and attending surgeons' performance at the depth condition. Conclusion: Image-based metrics are capable of suturing skill assessment, especially for distinguishing novices from surgeons. Depth constraints allow higher skill levels to be better differentiated. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-026-00596-2.

Indexed as

Computer visionMedical simulatorObjective metricsOpen surgerySurgical skill assessmentSuturing

Identifiers

PMID42876941
PMCPMC13661727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.