ArticleGlobal surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education2026
Developing and evaluating image-based metrics for open surgical suturing skill assessment.
Article in Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Open surgery training is vital in vascular surgery education. Traditionally, trainees' open surgical suturing skills are evaluated by their educators, which is a subjective and time-consuming process. This paper evaluates image-based metrics for surgical suturing skill assessment by comparing performance among three groups: attending surgeons, resident surgeons, and novices. Methods: A simulator, named SutureCoach, is developed to simulate a radial suturing task, performed either at "depth," representing a cavity, or at "surface." Among other sensors, the simulator includes cameras and computer vision software to track the motion of the needle and thread under the membrane being sutured. A set of image-based metrics are calculated for each suture based on video data. The set of metrics includes four previously proposed metrics as well as four new metrics inspired by a refined suturing phase segmentation scheme. To evaluate the performance of the image-based metrics, we conducted a study with 97 participants, divided almost evenly between attending surgeons, resident surgeons, and novices. Data was collected at several events over a 5-month period. Results: The statistical analysis shows that all metrics have significantly different means when comparing performance between novices and surgeons at both conditions, surface and depth. Furthermore, seven out of eight metrics have significant mean differences when comparing resident surgeons' and attending surgeons' performance at the depth condition. Conclusion: Image-based metrics are capable of suturing skill assessment, especially for distinguishing novices from surgeons. Depth constraints allow higher skill levels to be better differentiated. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-026-00596-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.