ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Apolipoprotein B in cardiovascular risk assessment: beyond traditional lipid markers.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) serves as the structural backbone of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles and plays a key role in lipid transport. A growing body of evidence indicates that circulating ApoB levels are closely associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases such as coronary atherosclerosis, and ApoB may be one of the most accurate markers for assessing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. This review discusses the limitations of conventional lipid measures, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG), and systematically examines the advantages of ApoB as an alternative marker for cardiovascular risk assessment, as well as its independent predictive value. In addition, this review discusses the clinical utility, potential advantages, and challenges associated with ApoB, as well as the effects of currently available lipid-lowering therapies on ApoB and recent advances in the development of ApoB-targeted therapies, with the aim of informing more precise strategies for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.