ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Identifying facility-level and infrastructure-level bottlenecks in Japan's lecanemab rollout through an online survey of dementia specialists.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The approval of lecanemab has created new operational demands for Alzheimer's disease care. Japan's nationwide rollout under universal health insurance offers an opportunity to identify real-world bottlenecks in treatment delivery. Objective: To identify facility-level and infrastructure-level factors associated with wait time to initial lecanemab infusion and treated patient volume among dementia specialists in Japan. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of an anonymous online survey of 296 dementia specialists certified to prescribe lecanemab in Japan approximately one year after approval. We examined associations between physician/facility characteristics, diagnostic and infusion resources, perceived implementation barriers, and two delivery metrics: wait time from first consultation to first infusion and number of treated patients per respondent. Bayesian accelerated failure-time and zero-truncated Poisson mixed-effects models were used. Results: Approximately 80% of respondents reported average wait times of 3 months or less, whereas the median treated caseload was modest at 5 patients per physician. Perceived mismatch between treatment capacity and demand was associated with longer wait time (time ratio 1.323, 95% credible interval 1.045-1.682). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-dominant amyloid-testing strategies tended to be associated with smaller caseloads, while in-house CSF testing and Conclusions: Japan's rollout may be constrained by some bottlenecks in diagnostics, infusion infrastructure, and uncompensated tasks. Appropriate policy interventions might help secure equitable access to the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.