ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Yaobitong plus celecoxib for low back pain: a Chinese multicenter cohort and network pharmacology study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Yaobitong capsule is frequently co-administered with celecoxib for low back pain in China, but its incremental effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice remain uncertain. We compared Yaobitong plus celecoxib with celecoxib alone and explored potential biological mechanisms. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included Chinese outpatients with low back pain treated at 3 hospitals. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 150 patients receiving Yaobitong plus celecoxib were compared with 150 receiving celecoxib alone. The primary outcome was the change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month. Secondary outcomes included pain, lumbar function, clinically meaningful response, rescue analgesic use, treatment escalation, and adverse events. Network pharmacology was conducted as an exploratory analysis. Results: After matching, measured baseline characteristics were balanced. At 1 month, the mean ODI reduction was 20.8 points with combination therapy and 14.6 points with celecoxib alone (between-group difference, -6.2 points; 95% CI, -8.36 to -4.04). Combination therapy was also associated with greater reductions in low back and leg pain and greater improvement in JOA score. Clinically meaningful ODI improvement occurred in 80.7% versus 64.0% of patients. Rescue analgesic use and treatment escalation were less frequent with combination therapy. Adverse events occurred in 19.3% and 16.0% of patients, respectively; no serious adverse events were documented. Exploratory network analyses highlighted cytokine- and inflammation-related targets and pathways. Conclusions: Adding Yaobitong to celecoxib may be associated with greater short-term improvement in disability, pain, and lumbar function, with no clear between-group difference in adverse events. Randomized trials with longer follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.