Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876899›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026

Professional Readiness and Implementation Barriers for Non-invasive Neuromodulation Among Attendees of an Educational Module in Mexico: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Survey.

Eleonora Ocampo-Coronado, Daniel San-Juan, Paola Denisse Ascencio-Ceja, Alan Hinojosa-Godínez, Carlos Trenado, Cristina Nachely Subia-Castro, Luis Fernando Díaz-López, Jesús Alejandro Aldana-López, Alejandro Velasco-Hernandez, Manuel Zorrilla-Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eleonora Ocampo-CoronadoDepartamento Académico de Medicina de Especialidad, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9874-6631
Daniel San-JuanInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-5851
Paola Denisse Ascencio-CejaDepartamento Académico de Medicina de Especialidad, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8976-5161
Alan Hinojosa-GodínezDepartamento Académico de Medicina de Especialidad, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3015-4345
Carlos TrenadoInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-4614
Cristina Nachely Subia-CastroNeuromodulación GDL, Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Center, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Luis Fernando Díaz-LópezNeurological Diagnostic Center, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8614-6276
Jesús Alejandro Aldana-LópezNeuromodulación GDL, Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Center, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-4912
Alejandro Velasco-HernandezBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0175-6829
Manuel Zorrilla-HernandezBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5574-1621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive neuromodulation is increasingly used in selected neuropsychiatric disorders, but implementation depends on professional readiness, training, access, perceived legitimacy, and local feasibility. This study assessed knowledge, perceptions, barriers, baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation, and future implementation or referral intention among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico. Methods: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey among attendees of an in-person educational neuromodulation module at a specialized academic congress in Mexico. Anonymous, real-time items assessed baseline familiarity; perceptions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; perceived barriers; baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation; and future implementation or referral intention. Analyses used descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, Spearman correlations, and exploratory univariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 111 participants answered at least one item. Baseline familiarity was limited: 22.2% reported basic knowledge, and 84.6% strongly disagreed that they had personal equipment. Baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation was 63.2% and was associated with basic knowledge (OR = 2.90; 95% CI = 1.44-5.84; Conclusions: Among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico, receptivity toward non-invasive neuromodulation was favorable, but operational readiness was limited. Responsible implementation may benefit from competency-based training, referral pathways, patient education, regulatory literacy, and sustainable access models.

Indexed as

Attitude of health personnelhealth services accessibilitymental healthreferral and consultationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42876899
PMCPMC13661823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.