ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Efficacy and safety of ripertamab in immune-mediated glomerular diseases with proteinuria: an expanded real-world cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ripertamab (SCT400), a recombinant anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, has shown efficacy in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). This study evaluated its broader therapeutic potential in immune-mediated glomerular diseases with proteinuria. Methods: In this ambispective real-world cohort study, 176 adult patients with biopsy-confirmed immune-mediated glomerular diseases presenting with proteinuria were enrolled, comprising 52 patients from a prior PMN analysis and 124 newly enrolled patients with diverse pathologies. Patients were stratified into initial therapy (n = 131) and alternative therapy (n = 45, prior treatment failure or relapse) groups. The PMN cohort (n = 150) was designated as the primary efficacy population; the primary efficacy outcomes were the proportions of patients achieving complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months in the PMN cohort. Outcomes of non-PMN patients (n = 26) were prespecified as exploratory and descriptive only. Results: The median potential follow-up was 19.5 (9.3, 28.5) months, and the median observed clinical follow-up was 9.3 (4.7, 18.1) months. In the PMN cohort, among patients with evaluable data at each respective timepoint, the CR/PR proportions were 45.6% (41/90) at 3 months, 54.4% (37/68) at 6 months, 59.6% (34/57) at 9 months, and 66.7% (30/45) at 12 months, with a 12-month CR rate of 15.6% (7/45). Previously treated patients achieved remission significantly more slowly than treatment-naive patients (median 232.5 vs. 83.0 days, P = 0.040), whereas complete-remission time did not differ; 12-month estimates were limited by small subgroups. Of the 77 PMN patients who achieved remission and had subsequent follow-up, 25 (32.5%) relapsed. Safety was favorable: AE incidence was 9.1%, with no Grade ≥3 AEs or treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In this single-arm, observational PMN cohort, ripertamab monotherapy was associated with clinically meaningful remission and favorable tolerability; causality cannot be established without a concurrent control group. Among evaluable patients, 12-month CR/PR was 69.4% and 55.6% in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients, respectively; the latter was based on only nine patients, who also remitted more slowly. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant controlled evaluation of ripertamab in PMN, including refractory disease. Non-PMN evidence remains exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.