ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
Olfactory dysfunction and submicroscopic abnormalities: unveiling hidden pathologies.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in high-resolution genomic technologies have revealed that several syndromes are associated with submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and, less frequently, duplications, thereby substantially contributing to the functional annotation of the human genome. Among these structural variants, recurrent microdeletions or microduplications often disrupt dosage-sensitive genes, leading to shared phenotypic outcomes in affected individuals. While features such as congenital heart defects, neurodevelopmental delays, and intellectual disability (ID) have been extensively studied, phenotypes resulting in olfactory dysfunction remain largely underexplored. Here, we review reported cases of copy number variants (CNVs) in patients with isolated or syndromic olfactory impairment and stratify the strength of associations between CNVs and olfactory dysfunction using predefined evidence levels. The available evidence ranges from well-supported
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.