ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Self-management perceptions and needs in patients with thoracic surgical wound dehiscence: a descriptive phenomenological qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative wound dehiscence is a severe complication in thoracic surgery, yet patients' self-management experiences remain largely underexplored. This study aims to explore the current cognitive status and potential needs of patients with dehiscence after thoracic surgery regarding self-management in the Chinese context, and to provide a theoretical basis for formulating personalized and precise wound self-management support plans. Methods: This study adopts a descriptive phenomenological qualitative research design. By using the purposive sampling method, patients with postoperative wound dehiscence in thoracic surgery who visited three tertiary hospitals in Shanghai from March 2026 to May 2026 were selected as the participants for semi-structured in-depth interviews. With the aid of NVivo 15.0 software, the interview data were sorted and analyzed by using the seven-step analysis method of Colaizzi phenomenology. Results: A total of 21 participants were ultimately included in this study, and 2 core themes and 6 sub-themes were extracted. Theme 1, Cognitive and practical limitations in self-management, comprises: knowledge deficit and cognitive biases; limited self-care capacity; and illness uncertainty with negative attitudes. Theme 2, Multidimensional needs for self-management support, includes: professional knowledge and skills guidance; continuous professional care; and psychosocial support. Conclusion: Patients with thoracic surgical wound dehiscence experience significant cognitive dissonance and face complex practical barriers during self-management. Their lived experiences highlight an urgent need for tailored professional guidance, continuous care, and psychosocial support. However, recruiting participants exclusively from tertiary hospitals in a single metropolitan area may limit the transferability of these findings. In the future, clinical medical staff should take patients' needs as the orientation, combine the cultural characteristics of China, and build a full-cycle self-management support model to empower patients, alleviate illness uncertainty, and promote wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.