ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Exploring partially shared valuation-related neural responses between abstract desirability and food incentive evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivational evaluation can generalize across diverse goals, while the incentive value of biologically relevant stimuli such as food is dynamically modulated by physiological need. The present study examined whether cross-category desirability evaluation under a non-deprived baseline condition and food incentive evaluation under experimentally manipulated Hunger and Satiety states show partially similar valuation-related neural responses within the same individuals. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while completing two complementary experiments: an abstract desirability judgment task involving objects, events, and persons, and a food evaluation task conducted under Hunger and Satiety states. In the DESIRE experiment, neural responses associated with desirable versus undesirable judgments were examined across three semantic categories to identify candidate neural patterns related to abstract desirability evaluation. In the HUNGER experiment, analyses examined both baseline food incentive value and hunger-related increases in food desirability. Exploratory whole-brain analyses identified activation patterns involving medial frontal and cingulate valuation-related regions, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), during abstract desirability evaluation. Exploratory maps in baseline food incentive-value evaluation analysis also implicated medial frontal and cingulate valuation-related regions. In addition, food items whose desirability increased under hunger showed greater activation than rating-stable food items in the left inferior orbitofrontal cortex, together with visual, cerebellar, and sensorimotor regions. However, formal conjunction-null analyses, ROI-based convergence analyses, whole-brain overlap analyses, and permutation-based tests did not provide evidence for a statistically robust shared neural representation across abstract desirability and food valuation. These findings suggest that cross-category desirability evaluation and homeostatically modulated food incentive evaluation may involve partially overlapping valuation-related processes while remaining sensitive to semantic context and physiological state. The results provide preliminary support for the possibility that abstract motivational cognition may partially engage valuation-related processes that are also involved in physiological incentive evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.