ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Assessment of an automated telesurveillance system on serious falls prevention in an elderly suffering from dementia specialized care unit: The URCC GET-BETTER study (geriatric environmental telecare - behavioral engineering technology to enhance rehabilitation).
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01561872 (Assessment of an Automated Telesurveillance System on Serious Falls Prevention in an Elderly Suffering From Dementia Specialized Care Unit), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of an Automated Telesurveillance System on Serious Falls Prevention in an Elderly Suffering From Dementia Specialized Care Unit: the URCC. GET-BETTER Study (Geriatric Environmental Telecare - Behavioral Engineering Technology To Enhance Rehabilitation)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: " Objective: To assess the impact of ATS on the prevention of serious nocturnal falls in URCC. Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial including 344 patients in the URCC units of Brive and Limoges. Patients in the intervention group were monitored with ATS, while controls stayed in rooms without ATS. Results: Patients had a mean age of 83.6 years (SD = 6.1), with 58% women. The cumulative incidence of serious nocturnal falls was 0.01 (SD = 0.02) per patient per stay, with no difference between groups (U = 13,739; p = 0.262). For non-serious nocturnal falls, incidence was 0.03 (SD = 0.07) in the intervention group versus 0.01 (SD = 0.04) in control group (U = 15,391; p = 0.054). Total nocturnal falls were similar (0.03 versus 0.02; U = 14,684; p = 0.529). Conclusions: ATS allowed detection of more non-serious nocturnal falls, potentially enabling tailored prevention strategies to reduce future falls. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01561872 (registered 13/02/2015).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.