ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Operationalizing health equity: a mixed-methods approach to measuring organizational capacity in public health practice.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Health equity is a core function of public health practice, yet most public health agencies lack tools to assess their internal capacity to advance it. Existing measurement efforts have focused primarily on community-level health disparities rather than the organizational infrastructure, leadership, and practices needed to address them. This study aimed to develop a reliable survey for measuring organizational equity capacity within public health agencies. Methods: We used a two-phase, mixed-methods approach. First, we identified priority organizational domains through concept mapping with 73 state and local practitioners. Findings informed the development of a 47-item survey administered to a national sample of practitioners ( Results: Concept mapping identified eight domains: Funding, Agency Practices, Communication, Data Practices, Organizational Partnerships, Community Representation, Leadership, and Staff Development. Through CFA, we identified a 32-item, eight-factor survey with strong model fit (CFI = 0.908; RMSEA = 0.066). All subscale domains showed good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.91). Conclusion: Organizational health equity capacity is multidimensional rather than a single undifferentiated construct. This pragmatic and reliable 32-item instrument provides a rigorous tool for agencies to assess internal equity infrastructure. Agencies can use this tool to benchmark organizational capacity and track systemic progress toward institutionalizing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.