Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876857›Full record

ReviewDiscover sustainability2026

Emerging livestock science and technologies can drastically alter the projections of global food security models.

Masoud Ghaderi Zefreh, Marcos E Dominguez Viera, Saeed Moghayer, Zuzana Smeets Kristkova, Willem-Jan van Zeist, Nils Bunnefeld, Ricardo Pong-Wong, Markus Dettenhofer, Ioannis Manikas, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover sustainability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masoud Ghaderi ZefrehRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-2718
Marcos E Dominguez VieraWageningen Social and Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Saeed MoghayerWageningen Social and Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Zuzana Smeets KristkovaWageningen Social and Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Willem-Jan van ZeistWageningen Social and Economic Research, Wageningen University and Research, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Nils BunnefeldBiological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Ricardo Pong-WongRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Markus DettenhoferFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ioannis ManikasFaculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Andrea Doeschl-WilsonRoslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the projected increase in the global population and food demand on a planet in climate crisis, the debate about the role of livestock continues to intensify. Animals farmed for food are both victims and contributors of climate change (CC), with animals suffering from heat stress due to CC but also being major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Livestock studies have demonstrated that novel breeding technologies could partly mitigate these negative effects, yet their wider implications for food security and the socio-economy are not well investigated yet. In this proof-of-concept study, we incorporate (1) the effects of heat stress on livestock's productivity and feed efficiency and (2) the use of genomic selection as a recently established novel breeding technology, into a global macroeconomic projection model (GMPM) to evaluate their broader impacts on food security. We find that both effects can drastically alter the model projections. In particular, the results suggest that novel breeding technologies can substantially mitigate the adverse effects of CC on production, food availability, land use, and GHG emissions, whilst also causing implications for the labour market. The study demonstrates the importance of integrating advances in livestock science and technology into GMPMs for better projections that inform livestock management, policy and consumer decision-making, requiring closer collaboration between livestock scientists and systems modellers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04101-z.

Indexed as

BreedingClimate changeFood securityGenomic selectionGlobal macroeconomic projection modelsLivestock

Identifiers

PMID42876857
PMCPMC13661643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.