ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Learning Curve for Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Junior Endoscopic Spine Surgeon: A Phase-Specific Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (BE-TLIF) is an emerging minimally invasive spinal fusion technique with unique technical demands. Understanding its learning curve is essential for improving surgical efficiency and ensuring patient safety, particularly for junior surgeons with prior biportal decompression experience but limited fusion background. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 70 consecutive BE-TLIF levels performed by a single junior surgeon with extensive biportal decompression but limited minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) experience (< 10 cases). Learning progression was assessed using learning curve-cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and exponential regression analyses. Operative times were evaluated across 6 surgical phases, and perioperative and clinical outcomes were compared between groups stratified by LC-CUSUM proficiency. Results: LC-CUSUM identified procedural competence after 62 levels, while exponential regression demonstrated plateauing around 43 cases. Phase-specific analysis revealed significant reductions in approach and decompression times, with the greatest improvement in cage insertion (37.1% reduction). Bone grafting time increased with experience, reflecting more meticulous technique. Clinical outcomes, including Oswestry Disability Index and Functional Rating Index scores, improved significantly in both groups, with greater functional recovery and fewer complications observed in later cases. Conclusions: BE-TLIF demonstrates a phase-specific learning curve, with proficiency achieved after sufficient case volume. Structured training focusing on decompression and cage insertion may accelerate skill acquisition. Comprehensive inclusion of multi-level cases and phase-specific time analysis provide a robust framework for evaluating technical proficiency in endoscopic spine surgery training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.