Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876830›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026

Recommendations for microbiological sampling in infected hard-to-heal wounds: an Italian association for cutaneous ulcers (AIUC) perspective.

Sara Carella, Barbara De Angelis, Barbara Nardi, Francesco Branda, Diego Ceci, Caterina Borghetti, Alessandra Mercuri, Marino Cordellini, Cosimo Maglio, Monica Gonnelli and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara CarellaDepartment of Surgery, Complex Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, USL Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy.
Barbara De AngelisComplex Wounds Unit, Policlinico Casilino, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Barbara NardiMicrobiology Laboratory, Assisi Hospital, USL Umbria 1, Assisi, Assisi, Perugia, Italy.
Francesco BrandaUnit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Diego CeciDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Caterina BorghettiDepartment of Medicine, Departmental Simple Structure (S.S.D.) of Angiology, San Matteo degli Infermi Hospital, USL Umbria 2, Spoleto, Italy.
Alessandra MercuriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Complex Unit of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Marino CordelliniDepartment of Surgery, Complex Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, USL Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy.
Cosimo MaglioComplex Wounds and Diabetic Foot Clinic, Emergency General Surgery Unit, Ospedali Riuniti della Valdichiana Senese, Montepulciano, Siena, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy.
Monica GonnelliWound Care and Diabetic Foot Clinic and Nursing Clinic for Complex Skin Lesions, Ospedali Riuniti della Valdichiana Senese, Montepulciano, Siena, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy.
Riccardo GarceaInfirmary of the General Command of the Carabinieri, Arma dei Carabinieri, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo CeccarelliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic and hard-to-heal wounds represent a significant and growing healthcare burden, frequently complicated by infection and impaired healing. Despite the availability of international guidelines, microbiological assessment in clinical practice remains highly heterogeneous, with substantial variability in sampling techniques, timing, and interpretation of results. This variability occurs within a broader One Health context, where antimicrobial resistance and microbial ecology are shaped by interconnected human, environmental, and healthcare factors. The present recommendations, developed by the Italian Association for Cutaneous Ulcers (AIUC), aim to provide a structured and operational framework for microbiological sampling in infected hard-to-heal wounds. A multidisciplinary expert panel conducted a structured review of the literature and developed consensus-based recommendations through iterative discussion. The resulting framework addresses key aspects of the diagnostic pathway, including indications for sampling, selection of techniques (swab, tissue biopsy, and fine needle aspiration), standard operating procedures, and principles for the interpretation of microbiological findings. The recommendations emphasise a context-driven approach to sampling, recognising the complementary roles of different techniques according to clinical presentation and depth of infection. Particular attention is given to the distinction between colonisation and infection, the limitations of quantitative thresholds, and the impact of biofilm, polymicrobial interactions, and host-related factors on diagnostic accuracy and antimicrobial response. The document also highlights the importance of integrating microbiological data with clinical assessment to support appropriate antimicrobial stewardship. By translating existing evidence into practical and reproducible procedures, these recommendations aim to reduce variability in clinical practice and improve the quality of microbiological diagnostics in wound care. Within a One Health perspective, standardised and reliable microbiological data may also support surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and inform more integrated infection control strategies. The proposed framework supports more consistent clinical decision-making and may contribute to optimising antimicrobial use and patient outcomes across diverse healthcare settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiopsyinfected hard-to-heal woundslaboratory-methodsmedico-legal implicationsrecommendationsswab

Identifiers

PMID42876830
PMCPMC13662285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.