ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Toward the concept of creative planetary health: insights from creative nature-based community practices in the UK.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Planetary health recognizes the interdependencies between the health of humans and the state of the environment. The triple planetary crisis of climate change, diversity loss, and pollution impacts unequally on human health depending on environmental and social determinants, exacerbating pre-existing inequalities. Creative nature-based and cultural community practices have the potential to address planetary and human health issues and tackle health inequalities. Methods: Data triangulation examined convergence and divergence of findings from two qualitative studies of creative nature-based community programs aiming to enhance planetary and human health. Studies using interview and case study designs were conducted by different researchers from the same investigative team. Results: Thematic analysis identified 11 themes with 23 subthemes for interview data, and eight themes with 25 subthemes for case study data. High levels of convergence were observed between nine themes and 18 subthemes from interview data with six themes and 21 subthemes from case study data. Triangulation and amalgamation of similar themes and subthemes determined six new, more focused themes: Concern about climate change; Connecting with nature; Creativity; Mental health and wellbeing; Mutually supported collaboration; Providing an inclusive environment, and 13 subthemes. Conclusions: Triangulation increased the study's validity and strengthened its overall credibility. Findings interpreted through a biopsychosocial framework aligned with community, environment, and wellbeing domains. Creativity was represented strongly in both analyses. Findings suggest that creative planetary health practices which promote connection with nature and other people positively impact individual and collective health and wellbeing, and develop care for the environment, thereby supporting the concept of creative planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.