Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876796›Full record

ArticleeGastroenterology2026

Preoperative 3D morphological phenotyping of hepatocellular carcinoma via a foundation model: a non-invasive biomarker for recurrence risk stratification.

Hongbin Wang, Xiaogen Zhou, Kun Zhang, Kan He, Wenao Ma, Mingyang Li, Han Xue, Ye Sun, Yingzhu Cui, Xiaopeng Wang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eGastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hongbin Wang *China-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xiaogen Zhou *Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kan HeChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Wenao MaDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Mingyang LiChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Han XueChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Ye SunChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yingzhu CuiChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Xiaopeng WangDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Institute of Tianjin, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Alfred Wei Chieh KowDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonghua Second People's Hospital, Tonghua, Jilin, China.
Wen ShenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Huimao ZhangChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Qi DouDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Lei ZhangChina-Singapore Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Liver Disease Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-7647
Zhongqi FanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Guoyue LvDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-4955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Imaging features play a central role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) staging, but current systems remain limited in prognostic precision and treatment guidance. Pathological gross classification, which categorises HCC into four subtypes based on tumour margin morphology, represents a morphological surrogate of aggressive tumour behaviour encompassing histological and molecular features and has demonstrated value in predicting prognosis and guiding adjuvant locoregional therapy selection. Importantly, gross classification is assessable through imaging, but its evaluation utterly depends on postoperative pathology and remains subjective, time-consuming and poorly reproducible. We aimed to develop a three-dimensional (3D) Foundation Model-driven system to automatically perform non-invasive morphological phenotyping and to evaluate its prognostic utility. Methods: A cohort of 551 patients who underwent hepatectomy after gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI from two medical centres was retrospectively analysed. Pathological gross classification served as the reference standard. The 3D MorphStratify Model was built to automatically phenotype 3D gross classification with a dedicated 3D Foundation Model encoder and a channel-aware fusion module. A combined model integrating 3D MorphStratify and Conventional Imaging Predictors (Morph-CIP) was constructed and validated for recurrence risk stratification. The biological rationale linking imaging morphological phenotyping to underlying biology was preliminarily explored. Results: Eligible patients were divided into a development dataset (n=291), a validation dataset (n=192) and an external test set (n=68). The 3D MorphStratify Model achieved a micro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.932, significantly outperforming senior radiologists (AUC 0.825) with about 40-fold improved efficiency. The imaging-based 3D morphological phenotyping (3D MorphStratify) independently predicted poor recurrence-free survival (RFS, HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.87, p=0.010). The Morph-CIP Model enables risk stratification through training set (AUC 0.836, 0.768, 0.765 for 1-year, 2-year, 3-year RFS), internal test set (AUC 0.816, 0.690, 0.711) and external test set (AUC 0.737, 0.709, 0.702). The high-risk group is characterised by the enrichment of glycolysis and hypoxia signalling pathways. Conclusion: 3D MorphStratify is the first automated 3D morphological phenotyping system for HCC, transforming subjective pathological gross classification into an objective, non-invasive imaging biomarker. The integration of 3D MorphStratify with conventional imaging predictors enables recurrence risk stratification, potentially providing complementary information for prognostic evaluation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinomaHepatocellularLocalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm RecurrencePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID42876796
PMCPMC13662042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.