ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Legal precarity as culturally situated acculturative stress: social support and psychological security among Akha-Hani cross-border wives in Southwest China.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article examines how legal precarity becomes acculturative stress and how relational support shapes psychological security among Akha-Hani cross-border wives in Southwest China. Existing acculturation research has established that migration involves psychological and sociocultural adjustment, but less is known about how stress develops when substantial cultural proximity coexists with legal and administrative uncertainty. Based on prolonged field engagement between 2022 and 2024 and formal ethnographic data collection from July to September 2024 in Xishuangbanna, the study draws on 28 in-depth interviews, four focus group discussions involving 29 additional participants, and participant observation. The findings show that shared Akha-Hani language, kinship, and ritual familiarity reduced some forms of interpersonal and cultural distance, but did not remove stress associated with documentation, public procedures, mobility, and family futures. Legal precarity became psychologically consequential through uncertainty, dependence on others, restricted agency, and reduced predictability in everyday family life. Mandarin was important mainly in public and institutional settings rather than as a general barrier within Akha-Hani households. Emotional, practical, and informational support from husbands, relatives, peers, and local networks helped women manage these pressures and strengthen psychological security. However, support was sometimes ambivalent when immediate assistance also maintained dependence on particular family relationships. The study contributes to cultural and migration psychology by showing how institutional insecurity can generate acculturative stress even under conditions of substantial cultural proximity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.