Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42876772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

A person-centered continuity pathway for pediatric contrast-enhanced imaging: sustaining one multisensory context across home, hospital, and scanner transitions.

Tommaso Liuzzi, Carmela Napolitano, Fiammetta D'Arienzo, Martina Frascari Diotallevi, Donatella Lettori, Andrea Magistrelli, Aurelio Secinaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tommaso LiuzziNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carmela NapolitanoAdvanced Cardio-Thoracic, Vascular and Fetal Imaging Unit, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Fiammetta D'ArienzoNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Martina Frascari DiotalleviNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Donatella LettoriNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MagistrelliRadiodiagnostic Unit Palidoro, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Aurelio SecinaroAdvanced Cardio-Thoracic, Vascular and Fetal Imaging Unit, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) require sustained cooperation, procedural immobility, and venous access, creating operational and experiential challenges for children, families, and imaging services. Existing nonpharmacological interventions generally address isolated procedural segments and do not preserve a familiar context across home, hospital, and scanner transitions. Innovation: Euterpe-Radiology (Euterpe-RAD) is a consent-gated, five-module institutional pathway that sustains one autobiographically anchored multisensory context-family-voice recordings, a personalized therapeutic composition, and child- or family-selected visual content-from home familiarization through hospital preparation, venous access, acquisition, and closure. Continuity is defined by content identity, coverage of four predefined transitions, and stability of the caregiver and therapeutic roles. The added value of continuity over single-segment preparation is a design hypothesis and is not tested here. Approach: This community case study describes pathway design and initial implementation under institutional quality-improvement governance. The pathway was offered to eight caregivers; six consented and two declined, both citing the organizational burden of the home-based component. Three children entered Module 1. One completed all five modules and underwent contrast-enhanced CT without sedation. Of the other two, one was excluded when photosensitivity was identified during the opening tele-anamnesis, and one completed home familiarization but did not undergo CT because cannulation was not tolerated. In three additional consenting children, the interval between referring-unit authorization and the scheduled examination was shorter than the 5-7-day home-familiarization window. Module 1 therefore could not be delivered; these children received hospital-stage music-therapy support only and underwent CT without sedation. These encounters are classified as partial deliveries rather than five-module completions. No MRI examination was delivered. Conclusions: One complete CT pathway was delivered without modification of acquisition or contrast protocols. The exclusions, procedural discontinuation, and partial deliveries define implementation boundaries rather than effects. These counts do not establish effectiveness, acceptability, or a sedation-sparing effect; the MRI branch remains a design specification, and prospective comparative evaluation is required.

Indexed as

care pathwayEuterpe methodmusic therapynonpharmacological interventionpediatric imagingperson-centered careprocedural preparationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42876772
PMCPMC13662128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.