ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Fusion-specific co-mutational architecture and treatment-response associations in pediatric core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter exome-profiled cohort.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is defined by one of two founding fusions, but cooperating lesions may differ between fusion subtypes. We characterized the broader diagnostic co-mutational architecture of pediatric CBF-AML and examined its relationship with post-induction measurable residual disease (MRD) and outcome. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 170 children with diagnostic whole-exome sequencing (WES) data (2019-2023), a subset of a reported 289-patient cohort. Candidate leukemia-associated variants were curated conservatively because matched normal samples were unavailable. Variant frequencies were compared between RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFB::MYH11 AML with false-discovery-rate control. Associations with MRD were tested using Fisher's exact test. Primary feature-specific Cox models for event-free survival (EFS) were adjusted only for fusion subtype and induction regimen; sensitivity analyses additionally addressed age and presenting WBC count, MRD, and transplantation. Results: In a limited selection audit, fusion-subtype and FLT3-ITD distributions were similar between WES-included and non-included patients, whereas clinical-source KIT positivity was more frequent in the WES subset. The analytic cohort included 138 RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and 32 CBFB::MYH11 cases; 137 received FLAG-IDA, and 33 received DAE induction. At least one curated candidate variant was present in 135 patients (79.4%), and 69 (40.6%) had alterations in two or more genes. Tyrosine-kinase signaling alterations occurred in 115 patients (67.6%). RAS-pathway alterations were enriched in CBFB::MYH11 AML (53.1% vs. 19.6%; P < 0.001, q=0.002), driven principally by NRAS (50.0% vs. 15.2%; P < 0.001, q < 0.001). Chromatin-modifier alterations were numerically enriched in RUNX1::RUNX1T1 AML (24.6% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.028) but did not remain significant after multiplicity correction (q=0.114). After false-discovery-rate correction, no tested genomic feature was associated with MFC-MRD or molecular MRD positivity after the second induction. With a median follow-up of 33.2 months, 3-year EFS and overall survival were 84.2% and 89.8%, respectively. No baseline genomic feature showed a significant association with EFS in either the primary or expanded baseline-covariate models. Conclusions: Among WES-profiled patients, pediatric CBF-AML showed fusion-specific co-mutational architecture, especially RAS-pathway enrichment in CBFB::MYH11 AML. In this WES-defined cohort, baseline genomic features were not established as response or outcome predictors. These findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating; they do not support treatment-specific causal inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.