ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A preliminary study on the assessment of bone age in children and adolescents in frigid-zone regions by the CHN-05 method.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bone age assessment is a key tool for monitoring growth and development in children and adolescents. This study analyzes bone age development characteristics among children and adolescents aged 6-18 years, to provide reference data for improving regional bone age standards. Methods: Bone age data were retrospectively collected and assessed using the CHN-05 method. The correlation and differences between bone age and chronological age were analyzed, developmental patterns were compared by gender, and regression equations were established. Results: The CHN-05 method showed a strong correlation between bone age and chronological age (R = 0.952, Conclusion: The CHN-05 method is reasonably suitable for bone age assessment in children and adolescents and provides valuable reference data for refining regional bone age standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.